Design Partner Value Calculator

The Serendipity Infrastructure™ - Where Knowledge Discovers Knowledge

Transform fragmented knowledge into living, self-evolving collective intelligence with verified ROI benchmarks

Forrester TEI Framework (0.648 conservative factor) | 145 Design Partners | 228 Proprietary Algorithms
1
Client Info
2
Use Case
3
Profile
4
Analysis

Client Information

Your data stays yours - processed locally with sovereign architecture. Never used for model training.

Select Your Industry

Each industry has validated benchmarks from Fortune 500, CAC 40, and proven POV results with 8.5x average ROI.

Select Your Primary Use Case

Powered by our Serendipity Infrastructure™ - 228 proprietary algorithms that make accidental discoveries inevitable.

Organization Profile

Detailed inputs enable precise benchmark matching and defensible ROI calculations validated by McKinsey, Forrester, and Gartner research.

ROI Analysis

Conservative 5-Year Net Value Created
-
-
-
Payback Period
-
Total Value Created
-
Net Value
-
Confidence Level
Investment vs Value Created Over Time
Cumulative Net Value Trajectory
timeline Year-by-Year Value Creation
How Knowledge Capsules™ compound value over time with our living intelligence platform
Value Component Breakdown
account_tree Detailed Component Analysis
Click each component to see McKinsey, Forrester, Gartner benchmarks with verified sources and transparent methodology
Export Business Case

Professional reports with full benchmark attribution for CFO and investment committee review

analytics How We Calculate Your ROI

Transparent, Verifiable, Investment-Grade Methodology

gavel Built on 30 Years of Consulting Excellence

Your inputs are processed through our proprietary value algorithm grounded in three decades of enterprise consulting best practices and validated by world-class research institutions: McKinsey Global Institute, Forrester Research, Gartner, BCG, Bain & Company, Deloitte, and 20+ peer-reviewed academic journals.

Every metric is traceable to its primary source with explicit statistical confidence levels (HIGH 85%+, MEDIUM 65-85%, LOW <65%). Our algorithm systematically applies the Forrester TEI conservative adjustment factor of 0.648 across all projections.

4,000+
Forrester TEI Studies
52
Documented Hypotheses
100+
Verified Sources
228
Proprietary Algorithms
info Methodological Foundation

Our methodology has been calibrated through 145 qualified enterprise analyses and conversations. All ROI projections are based on verified industry benchmarks from McKinsey, Forrester, Gartner, BCG, Bain, and Deloitte—not on production results.

calculate The Core Formula

5-Year Net Value = [Σ (Component Benefits × Temporal Distribution × 0.648)] - Total Investment

Where:
• Component Benefits = f(Your Inputs, Sector Benchmarks)
• Temporal Distribution = [12%, 18%, 22%, 24%, 24%]
• 0.648 = Forrester Conservative Factor
• Total Investment = Year 1 + (ARR × 4 years)

shield The Gold Standard: Forrester TEI Framework

Every calculation applies the Forrester Total Economic Impact (TEI) methodology—the industry standard trusted across 4,000+ commissioned studies over 20+ years.

The Conservative Factor: 0.648
Implementation Efficiency: 0.80 (80% realized)
Adoption Rate Factor: 0.90 (90% adoption)
Sustainability Factor: 0.90 (90% sustained)
═══════════════════════════════════════════════
Combined Factor: 0.80 × 0.90 × 0.90 = 0.648

checklist What This Means For You

  • check_circle Conservative by Design: All benefits systematically reduced to account for real-world implementation challenges
  • check_circle Peer-Validated: Methodology endorsed by Fortune 500 CFOs and investment committees worldwide
  • check_circle Audit-Ready: Complete transparency from input to output with documented assumptions

insights Key Benchmark Examples

  • H-GT-001: Forrester Adjustment Factor
    Type: BENCHMARK | Value: 0.648 | Confidence: VERY HIGH (90%)
    Source: Forrester TEI Methodology, 4,000+ studies
  • H-GT-002: Adoption Rates
    Type: BENCHMARK | Value: 50-60% baseline; 70-80% with structured change management
    Sources: MDPI 2022, Prosci | Confidence: HIGH (85%)
  • H-GT-003: Value Temporal Distribution
    Type: REASONED ESTIMATION | Value: [12%, 18%, 22%, 24%, 24%] years 1-5
    Justification: SaaS adoption curves | Confidence: MEDIUM (65%)
  • H-GT-004: Knowledge Multipliers
    Type: CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATE | Value: 1.6-2.5× salary by sector
    Literature: Range 2-4× (we use bottom of range) | Confidence: MEDIUM-HIGH (70%)

school World-Class Research Foundation

Your personalized ROI draws from 52 documented hypotheses validated against Tier 1 authorities and peer-reviewed academic research.

  • business McKinsey Global Institute
    • 1.8 hours/day wasted searching (20% of workweek)
    • 20-25% productivity gains with knowledge management
    • $900B-$1.3T annual value potential
    link View McKinsey Research →
  • verified_user Forrester Research
    • 4,000+ TEI studies over 20+ years (official figure)
    • Conservative 0.648 factor standard
    • Trusted by Fortune 500 CFOs
    link View Forrester TEI →
  • analytics Gartner
    • Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) framework est. 1987
    • Operating costs often exceed purchase 3-5× over lifecycle
    warning Detailed reports require Gartner subscription
  • insights IDC (via Harvard Business Review)
    • Fortune 500 lose $31.5B annually from poor knowledge sharing
    • Cited in HBR 2017 by Christopher G. Myers
    warning Original IDC study is proprietary (paid report)
  • psychology Prosci (Change Management Authority)
    • Change management delivers 3:1 to 7:1 ROI
    • 63-78% success with CM vs 24% without
    • 6.5× more likely to meet objectives
  • account_balance Academic Sources
    • MIT Sloan Management Review (peer-reviewed)
    • Journal of General Internal Medicine (peer-reviewed)
    • Journal of Health Economics - Tufts Center
    • U.S. Department of Energy official data
  • groups SHRM (Society for Human Resource Management)
    • Replacement costs average 213% of salary
    • 2 years to reach same efficiency
    • Comprehensive turnover cost analysis
    Source: SHRM 2024 benchmarking studies
  • trending_up Gallup
    • 12 months average to full productivity
    • 50% better retention with structured orientation
    • 82% stay with good onboarding vs without
  • business Accenture
    • Only 16% of organizational content is accessible
    • 84% locked in silos across organizations
    • Critical knowledge management gap identified
    Source: Accenture 2007 (cited via McKinsey)
  • science Panopto / YouGov
    • 42% of knowledge unique to individuals
    • $2.4M-$265M annual losses by company size
    • 1,001 employee survey (200+ employee orgs)
    link View Panopto Research →
search Source Transparency & URL Legend

All sources are TRUE and verifiable:

✓ Public URL: Freely accessible online
check_circle Public URLs provided when available

⚠ Partial Access: Public framework but detailed reports require subscription
warning Proprietary/paid reports clearly indicated (e.g., Gartner, IDC, LexisNexis)

✗ Not Public: Proprietary client insights or paid reports
lock Available through publisher subscriptions

menu_book 100+ citations with full attribution
school Peer-reviewed academic sources prioritized

tune Market Calibration Process

Our algorithm has been calibrated through 145 qualified enterprise conversations (September 2024 - June 2025) across target sectors.

145
Qualified Conversations
7
Industry Sectors

pie_chart Conversation Distribution

  • 44 Consulting & Professional Services
    Pain points: Partner knowledge loss, client retention, project efficiency
  • 87 SMB & Growth Companies
    Pain points: Key employee departures, rapid scaling, limited budgets
  • 21 Pharmaceutical & Biotech
    Pain points: R&D duplication, regulatory compliance, expert retirement
  • 14 Financial Services
    Pain points: Regulatory fines, trader turnover, risk detection
info Calibration Context

From these engagements, we extracted:

What we captured:
check_circle Sector-specific pain points and budget ranges
check_circle ROI decision thresholds and buying processes
check_circle Common objections and competitive dynamics

Your ROI calculation is based on:
check_circle Verified industry benchmarks (McKinsey, Forrester, Gartner, etc.)
check_circle Peer-reviewed academic research
check_circle 30 years of consulting best practices
check_circle Conservative Forrester TEI methodology (0.648 factor)

visibility Complete Transparency Commitment

Unlike generic ROI calculators, we provide full algorithmic transparency with every calculation.

rule Hypothesis Classification System

Every calculation is built on 52 documented hypotheses classified by confidence level:

  • BENCHMARK (High Confidence 85%+)
    Supported by McKinsey, Forrester, Gartner, peer-reviewed research
  • CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATE (Medium Confidence 65-85%)
    Industry patterns with built-in safety margin
  • REASONED ESTIMATION (Medium-Low Confidence 55-65%)
    Logical inference from analogous situations

check_circle What You Get With Every Calculation

  • functions
    Algorithmic Transparency Box
    Step-by-step methodology, all hypotheses referenced, sensitivity analysis
  • source
    Benchmark Attribution
    Primary sources with URLs, confidence levels, validation methodology
  • psychology_alt
    Confidence Assessment
    Every metric classified: HIGH (85-95%), MEDIUM (65-85%), LOW (<65%)
  • analytics
    Sensitivity Analysis
    Conservative vs optimistic scenarios for key variables
lock Your Data, Your Control

Data Sovereignty Guarantee:
check_circle Processed locally in your browser
check_circle Never transmitted for training or resale
check_circle Sovereign architecture: your data stays yours
check_circle Zero-hallucination AI: verified against source documents

description Investment-Grade Documentation

Request complete methodology documentation for CFO review, investment committee presentations, or technical deep dives. We'll send you the full materials within 24 hours.

mail Request Investment Documentation

Built on 30 years of consulting excellence.
Calibrated through 145 enterprise conversations.
Grounded in 4,000+ Forrester TEI studies.
Backed by 52 documented hypotheses with 100+ sources.

This is not marketing hyperbole.
This is investment-grade value engineering.